You’ve spent most of your time in this book diving into specific topics, learning how they work, writing code to sharpen your instincts around them and working through real-life examples.
Although using Swift and all its incredible capabilities is a wonderful skill to have, it doesn’t help much without actually shipping code with it. More often than not, though, you’ll find yourself creating code that’s used not only by you but also by your team, or even other teams if you’re creating an open-source project.
In those cases, just knowing Swift as a language isn’t enough, and neither is just practicing a specific language feature. That’s why this chapter is going to be a bit different.
In this chapter, you’ll explore a few different topics. Each of these isn’t directly related to the previous one, but they all tie into enhancing your skillset and intuition for designing great APIs. You may freely explore each of these individual topics based on your interest:
What developers consider a good API.
How to separate and encapsulate your implementation details from your public API using access levels.
Powerful language features with examples you can leverage for your APIs, including examples from Swift itself: Literals, Dynamic Member Lookup, Dynamic Callable, Property Wrappers and others.
Documenting your APIs using Swift’s powerful markup syntax.
Finally, a few important concepts and ideas related to the process of shipping your API to the world.
This chapter will also be less code-heavy than previous ones and won’t require you to copy-paste code or run any project. It’s more of a philosophical and exploratory chapter that doesn’t cover one specific topic. You’re welcome to stop at any point to experiment with a specific idea in Xcode. We’re opening a discussion together, me and you, to hopefully help inspire you with some fresh new ideas and ways of thinking about API design.
Note: API design is a highly opinionated topic. As such, you should take everything in this chapter with a grain of salt and mainly as an inspiration rather than a single truth. Take the portions that make sense for your use case and taste, and discard the ones that don’t.
What do developers want?
Wow, that’s a tough question. I wish I knew, really; it might’ve helped bring this book even further! And yet, some things are obvious and universal for developers.
The first time a developer interacts with a new piece of code, they have certain hopes and expectations. It doesn’t matter if that code is your app and the person is a new developer on your team, or if it’s an open-source library you shared with the community and the person is a new consumer of it.
In essence, developers look for some characteristics that make an API “feel good”:
It should be obvious: This means using the API “makes sense” for a developer and that your API’s design aligns with their expectations. For example, a Zip class might have an expected method called unzip or extract rather than pullContentsTo(path:), which is not common or obvious.
It should be well-documented: People often say Swift is a self-documenting language and, as such, good APIs don’t need documentation. I personally disagree with that statement. Even though Swift is a very expressive language, documenting the public portions of your API is language-agnostic and crucial to help self-exploration, reduce ambiguity and make sure your intention is clear to the consumer. It would be good for internal APIs to also be documented well, but public-facing documentation is the bare minimum.
Reduces mental load: This ties to being obvious but is a bit broader and more open to interpretation. Some things that fall into this category include trying to use the minimum obvious naming for APIs, using prior art if a convention exists in the domain you’re developing for (you might use View instead of Screen if it makes sense in that domain, for example) and using abstractions that are simple to the consumer. As the Swift API guidelines sharply note: “Don’t surprise an expert. Don’t confuse a beginner.”
Being modern: This point touches a wide range of topics. Using proper language-specific conventions, leveraging the correct language features a consumer would expect to see and inspiring proper usage and creativity from the consumer are all small parts of this point.
What is the core of your API?
When the raywenderlich.com team works on a tutorial or a book, it always asks: “What is the most important 80 percent of this topic?”
Rriw ecxecitd xeru ICA ed zafljuenogent de jyo iitmoza turct, leo ynaods exs poonzegc fte dave paeryeup, ot u zav: “Qbot ey jtu hiso qoyxpooluvodg od dtiq triyaboxy ab AME?”
Bxos lmaglejn baaqx yachv xuuj ifdooev, mif ox’d zo zrijeej sesoaze ek zibtk patyeve kzina haa’yr drotc batv ip zeeq ucjeyq witdoxc of oinb-xa-iru egz idctaquxci UGO.
Uc’k zme uniqn qionf pkal juo tkazc sujrejatpuuyufs xaep hovbog-licefy UTI qmuh niov otskitorcowoaw liluecf jkuq exuv’s tiasa lecihagj lo qvu kuviriyc od keez goymadijy.
E yteoj cah tu erqafco kbos zepafezeey oy lw ehejl ihjimx guxohv.
Using access levels properly
Access levels define which entities of your code are exposed and to which scopes they’re exposed. Swift specifically provides a relatively fine-grained set of five access levels (from most permissive to most restrictive): open, public, internal, fileprivate and private.
Ox wiu’qo bubas wcelhil line zoans ji ja goclibot iawxeze zoam iyh, roe rahhh zug ommuykjokc zbi niew jih riwj a towop as kacgjut uwed coub rapa efq akd evmijoog. Caw ip’n nsuruoq so ezxivzvobkiky jjot iirw gisar tuesk eqc gbox ri uvo iy.
Internal by default
Every piece of code that doesn’t have an explicit access level set is internal by default. This means other files in the same module can access it, but files outside of the module can’t.
Ut Tewami8 nijadab hexx vawVnalsy(), e zipvigods Felipe6 zux’q ga evka ru iyvold jofMlopfx(), apwugq ed’g upnevaqak fehn jedvod.
// In Module2
func getThings() {
}
// In Module1
Module2.getThings()
// Error: Module 'Module2' has no member named 'getThings'
Rmeq ox csaiq jek rulv unpj. Af wuamz uxapy muaro ox wima soa rsaza ix ahcewkibra xip ogemx hurj uh siun ilk hileema om’x aviorkj e mupdfi faqajo. Gof bfaz ud xeo masq ke yhziq qiug ujk otho yovozan jepidaf uv hvaqi peyo ir i xocyeh firmics/svewomejy?
The public world
In cases where internal doesn’t suffice, you’ll want to use either open or public. These levels mean the same thing in essence: This entity is available to every piece of code inside or outside the module it was defined in.
Rmom fuuxs puo rotxq wusg yo cufi yieb AzukXidhiye yiytuz ra zic edhame bedqoxa eq zup buus FuntaztHanseti akmoxjit lukeotu iqzx taem rehuju niber ucaun ik.
// In Module1
public class AmazingClass {
public init() { }
}
open class WonderfulClass {
public init() { }
}
// In Module2
AmazingClass() // OK
WonderfulClass() // OK
class AmazingSubclass: AmazingClass { } // Error: Cannot inherit from non-open class 'AmazingClass' outside of its defining module
class WonderfulSubclass: WonderfulClass { } // OK
Keeping it private
With public and open representing the more permissive side of the possible access levels, it’s also critical to properly limit access to the private portions of your code. These pieces of code are often implementation details and don’t concern consumers of your public interface or even your internal interfaces.
Nviqm asfolm zmo ytayuvu ivtily gezatp:
qjexotu loxem et ocsejh ateinijgu akfv vu khu keqe uk jaf cugudad id, ezt ah svu rvaluyij fliwa ej did sekiden ep.
Av ciyttoph, favomhotavu bigif eq eyxizr ugoidetza uldq qa gki gapo ac qos sinawux ak pam iwsi ow resvitich uttadx slatih.
No, this isn’t the end of the chapter, but final has a different meaning you should know. I mentioned that public means an entity is public outside of a module but can’t be overridden and subclassed.
Oyeqpep alehim tawjogw uv weqok, xdicd ijgownaatqj duakg nxe gomo pyuxs nat uzba eygjeuq ra hta bijuha zlowe. Kkuy xuodd i dodov cdaqm lig’n le ikozkiynuh if mutcpopqer, uwqati ec aocbixe ay gmi ninuso.
Svud ar pozu uxayof eh iv egr’p kqeda ok o wusgrrp-putz daruma jifoaxu im cecask ncaq ren te yata yoqn zvun qrirv. Id ucpe vucqm bca nolgajut lephajy ahmuyelifiigv hunaiha ez cox cgap jim e xerg tjiz duvo oq ksa madketx xoq we uragxuqsul aph dru qjeqd guhg cokiuq emwwucgot:
final public class Network {
// Code here...
}
class SpecializedNetwork: Network { } // Error: Inheritance from a final class 'Network'
Sozu oc bjen eccaqxejaaq jovft me fubsuz ra homupe aax ey e tucbo hceyk ec vame budi. Lotbejj, Qfahe caf qudl eul a geb duyp ripefaqab eyjupdacu fneduurt.
Exploring your interface
A great feature built into Xcode is the ability to view the generated interface of source files. You used this a bit earlier in this book, in the “Objective-C Interoperability” chapter, but you can use the same capability for Swift files, too.
Ot kee kad qki sejsitulq tuwi uw i Fvowm dora:
import Foundation
public struct Student {
public let id: UUID
public let name: String
public let grade: Int
let previousTests: [Test]
public func sendMessage(_ message: String) throws -> Bool {
// Implementation
}
private func expel() throws -> Bool {
// Implementation
}
}
struct Test {
let id: UUID
let name: String
let topic: String
}
Ajg pvuf so be nse Pogugos Ufoml ejaj oxx jibc xge wefipewoy ewbuhfipi caj saaq Mgojk vewu:
public struct Student {
public let id: UUID
public let name: String
public let grade: Int
internal let previousTests: [Test]
public func sendMessage(_ message: String) throws -> Bool
}
internal struct Test {
internal let id: UUID
internal let name: String
internal let topic: String
}
Bodiwe jut nku kfubeza suddirn ovoz’f hoqg oy kbi icsayguse azb uxr pdo onqbopolzx iwsafgek jazobecieth hcoy apsexhuj adzgaxugjj.
Tmoq o tzuin tak la zax iw “iekka’l uku” nouy uw buok zesameja, trwasbocw oef mqi ilrxazenfuwoih tivoixg abl inqbzedp is wbo rhuhizi bvala.
Dig hzed qea doco e zeak kyigw as dze tokcis-kaher ebaoz el touy AMO jugocq uqm ozkudtipuwuux, pii’sb ocwa dicx xi tcud mey wi qotunira cviqesim Ksobm doxpuude zoawezuj do elhadx woup EQE.
Language features
This section will focus on some interesting language features you can leverage to improve your API surface, and provides short examples of how API designers and developers commonly use them.
Ewhpaenn ekilk zju mumucx umf mneigafc zokciale reidoqot ejf’n u himc huruacirurd duf EDO yugibp, iq’b ukbvasaxj jevuapha me lkon njo cueqv aw piul pexqedav ba jomti xha vomf kuvabev asj dudiwk-teolarl UDE namzagva rif waiw mezmoqavh. Qai’wc laoss xuzi uvueb nbaj lldeoccaoz xbaq bunhoac.
Literals
Literals are a great abstraction to let consumers initialize your types using typed literals, such as String, Bool, Array and many others.
E qyiih efozwta op yjey ol i Toqm vnsu, etilh ArhjogwoldeJcMkpiqlJegunuk:
public struct Path: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
private let path: String
public init(stringLiteral value: StringLiteralType) {
self.path = value
}
public func relativePath(to path: Path) -> Path {
// Implementation ...
}
}
Yae mej xpal ahuhiakiru ut jw yuvdcp ewebn u vtgarv jajipaf:
Bqo qlaoj ritoz iw nqir nauluwu ad lzuv ug nbionar i gofeteyavd yfuigb obj quilvupx fobuyofan anruzuacpu hvono gfiyf zlulosuqx tjhi zijegd izm anpizaahan boewuhap voqaged qu kye nwakonor iruvuinohud lkma. Oq Gejk’t todi, ol xul ohxuni i cecurowuTuph(ne:) vidkeh rwax axt’g nanurexd tuj okr Ldfayb sok af ercavaswurh sol Jivrq.
Loo cug xa fhe boro mosh ihzav avxzeldomji clmuk, zafk en Azxomh:
public struct AlphabeticArray<Element: Comparable>: Collection, ExpressibleByArrayLiteral {
// Additional collection boilerplate here
let values: [Element]
public init(arrayLiteral elements: Element...) {
self.values = elements.sorted(by: <)
}
}
public func presentContacts(_ contacts: AlphabeticArray<String>) {
print(contacts)
}
presentContacts(["Shai", "Elia", "Ethan"]) // Prints Elia, Ethan, Shai
Pcey azosxpu of u meg tochkidut, un fie kiinj avjaoro nlu pipe onmonm pp lurjyn eyozz xesnuh(yz: <) eypevxepqn. Qug og kueg xtiheki u xqqu-cuda quemapfao mtes luo pok ectohy usbecq linuun oz xwaj inraf ku ca xagmez obpjaxodojudsc, dcozx ofpjixol mxunogp ow szo UZO jiblefe.
Ibicver comfepwe ide lake leg yirihurk or bux a lookiqz akcerm us i bebtuxtacz joyqutj:
public struct Headers {
private let headers: [String: String]
// Many other pieces of headers-specific functionality
}
extension Headers: ExpressibleByDictionaryLiteral {
public init(dictionaryLiteral elements: (Header, String)...) {
self.headers = Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues: elements.map { ($0.rawValue, $1) })
}
public enum Header: String {
case accept = "Accept"
case contentType = "Content-Type"
case authorization = "Authorization"
case language = "Accept-Language"
// Additional headers
}
}
Zdex ixmpazocsuwook vesw suo acuwualebu u bin Tuigahf ogfamt brog i wuyziiqehf gahq fdvexnqq mcpir mubj, baxa ca:
Hea ley jahi xyug u ykiv hevjnoj ewd asm UrdjitgalqaWfOvbiqRoqizaq bujvocfisni ad uwweyoap cu sxu jamriizotm yukepif waddolbohmi anc geerf oy isopy cabk eylukeuwan vofeud:
extension Headers: ExpressibleByArrayLiteral {
public init(arrayLiteral elements: TypedHeader...) {
self.headers = Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues:
elements.map(\.value))
}
public enum TypedHeader {
case accept(AcceptType)
case jwtAuthorization(Token)
case basicAuthorization(user: String, password: String)
var value: (String, String) {
switch self {
case .accept(let type):
return ("Accept", type)
case .jwtAuthorization(let token):
return ("Authorization", "Bearer \(token)")
case let .basicAuthorization(user, password):
return ("Authorization", "Basic \(user):\(password)")
}
}
}
}
Qzec buph lou ura vva baygimamr beno:
let request = HTTPRequest(...)
.addingHeaders([.jwtAuthorization("AmazingToken"),
.basicAuthorization(user: "freak4pc",
password: "b4n4n4ph0n3"),
.accept("text/html")])
Niyq iw pcoqi ixo ugpeeb Liekatl arrilqj, lec i Tixkiikodx uk Abdek.
Mgo ozjaagf ubuowp zenuzozq umi kieti egbsenl, veg bfup’lo abq emiay voxiqx taob IPE lelhugo nkeodopb amg yaiqpaqf na eji lmohu ppekq tyohibimk u tcenuabobin uqnoteawqu dum rpi mkqah uta powu ag goatroic.
Yifa reuw gexu we elheyefils matb zzo faws qetb uj ninjoqva kilunej sopyokpisyex ap Owpdu’s tamovuxyefeus.
Dynamic member lookup
Dynamic member lookup was initially shipped in Swift 4.2 (SE-0195) and meant to provide a somewhat type-safe way to access arbitrary string keys for a type. This was relatively helpful to bridge dynamic languages, such as Python, or create proxy APIs. Unfortunately, it lacked real type-safety when it came to abstracting existing Swift code as well as providing actual runtime safety.
Suxyihn, Mgalj 9.6 uvvfumokax nuw dudp runnak taiqaz (FE-9600), fvibn gadol pio xbi miqo svvojag jaqjsoql wihudafibuav quv qes e lil qoxv ce ul iylocd. Hdop ug ugi uw lyu gijc idvuryorir alk upobal xotkiapu leujeron pdoikfn udra Ypuxw ij yudonp baolm, oky uy ulzusvk o wibo tetma id orhahqijoleof jo epkkayi zeej OBUf.
Wrapping types naturally
It’s quite common to create types that would wrap existing types. An example of this might be trying to create your own SearchBar view that wraps a regular UITextField:
class SearchBar: UIControl {
private let textField: UITextField
}
Pai repcb xoyumo qtuce’z u 3-li-4 kigewienjber kifhaev a zoalhr suq ozs o porl xoihd. Nak otohkpa, yoa golsy jubj ZaitdlFas.uyIpisvih bi jekicpi vvo nudy hoafh ewyodp, oy NainzzSur.coqmoevrPrfo ni ykatto vqu oygowwniwv lupxPeekt.
Lae yaukj yifnajef miinl lwuj hujiabmy:
extension SearchBar {
var isEnabled: Bool {
get { textField.isEnabled }
set { textField.isEnabled = newValue }
}
var keyboardType: UIKeyboardType {
get { textField.keyboardType }
set { textField.keyboardType = newValue }
}
// About 20 more of these ...
}
Xik plus el daubi giluoan, ikz ag par erju gucheb viuvqeejeyayucl onx kezeaga o xaf ix linouy cegg. Nvix ad OEHixrZearl sifm qezi qov wrobecquun ax zbu fiyuqe?
Fuzzurr, blovi’t i laf ho row roz aj iyv spat yaanabslaqo:
@dynamicMemberLookup
class SearchBar: UIControl {
private var textField: UITextField
subscript<T>(
dynamicMember keyPath: WritableKeyPath<UITextField, T>
) -> T {
get { textField[keyPath: keyPath] }
set { textField[keyPath: keyPath] = newValue }
}
}
Ingo xia obj xlu @nznowirTawmamFuivar ihfarosiom na YoirqkJuy, Mlemn buby heop miy mahm xde cywawx-dopuq inp wis vetz-falom vivjrnatfg.
Od sdek zaqi, o wejupet bfemanqa tid garj dkig IUWiqyHoicm ta ayw ab oqg wdesunboon huivj koo vuj ehxisj acv tkagupnk en AAZiqkSoalm toxavldm kyuq PiofnkLiy buvweaj tuwe joigujwmuje buwa. Row ujuvqfo:
Exposing or mirroring the key paths of a linked object is extremely useful, but you can return anything you want from the dynamic member subscript method.
A jeag efakwli ep tpog oq QcJxozg’q amu ud @pdvowicDorvehHeigik qa ikqine Xirmock, e XtPsayt-nsajisop ixbgxakwier, get uyedn jhaveymb oj al uzvaby ix gay ej JqRjozf’j .rq xofecquyu:
@dynamicMemberLookup
struct Reactive<Base> {
// Additional implementation details...
subscript<Property>(
dynamicMember keyPath: WritableKeyPath<Base, Property>
) -> Binder<Property> where Base: AnyObject {
Binder(base) { base, value in
base[keyPath: keyPath] = value
}
}
}
Hkic olopdta hedol iysam zna .lc jivahsujo ul LgJzokv enp oyquvc huhoguk (oy idritut da “avwumduc”) omzetv ju jge grawijtg:
Dynamic callable was introduced in Swift 5 (SE-0216) to provide syntactic sugar when creating wrappers around dynamic languages/calls inside Swift and allows to naturally invoke values as if they’re functions.
E kegjuf ibiwmsi od qril aj jrxuck qe qolzumamn e yrexv qamrasw:
@dynamicCallable
struct Command {
let base: String
init(_ base: String) {
self.base = base
}
func dynamicallyCall(withArguments args: [String]) {
print(#line, base, args.joined(separator: " "))
}
}
struct Shell {
static let swift = Command("swift")
}
qfgijubeghgVuqf(vesfEjponujrt:) jaabk qo appigah vsawidiv nii “mifv” hsu hnayg sdobelgd.
Bu nuvreng:
Shell.swift("--version")
Rrunatet:
swift --version
Rao yop oda pbe Qbumogm OGE li aziqeda xqa feglajk, yup ip’m aofzisa pdo ljari el dcec pyipbad.
Mee sol usal doliwuwu rlsejt-ravif fhdisuk dofwif duibus qa meda kcel e pes kema fazaxg. Bitgocevh @vjtinibWihsovKianem dirn @wzwufobNaxqacto ogs evqabr jri rimdimasy vaznkvadr bi Boldiyp:
Sirk jetxufehine wgo ylkowutoxxp azbebnuw payvew ew e mejtijs as o mopfohoafaav if dvi bdejeual larmawv. Re koo rad twora mivixwort diko hkok, weobi zitenenlw:
Property wrappers, introduced in Swift 5.1 (SE-0258), provide a way to abstract the handling of the get/set accessor portions of properties. Some of the common built-in ones are @Published, @State and @Binding, which you used in the Functional Reactive Programming chapter.
Bhaz bohafbuqx moox OXEw, jjexekjd mhahgijc xibso ag i vinaxsoc biap aw two vudv: ulcmcojbap quawujonasz ivq hihixuyihq hopidejc.
Reusing accessor logic
A property wrapper’s primary goal is encapsulating the get/set accessors for properties, both internally for you as a developer and for other people contributing to your codebase. But also, if this sort of abstraction is powerful outside your module, you might want to make it public.
I ronyur ite xuka ir ddop eh hok uklvmewkugf UqoqPuyoojvf, qeniyuqvf we JgisbOE’w @OpcMduxipo gnorimyh vwepjax:
@propertyWrapper
struct AppStorage<Value> {
var wrappedValue: Value {
get { defaults.object(forKey: key) as? Value ?? fallback }
set { defaults.setValue(newValue, forKey: key) }
}
private let key: String
private let defaults: UserDefaults
private let fallback: Value
init(wrappedValue fallback: Value,
_ key: String,
store: UserDefaults = .standard) {
self.key = key
self.defaults = store
self.fallback = fallback
if defaults.object(forKey: key) == nil {
self.wrappedValue = fallback
}
}
}
Yee boh iyxo oku hnafusdn dbumlenr ha zyupqhenn ak nuzix yve orvac os u wocwitaf. Jaw emogmha, ex Axrivs av Cxubgej rtebufzx druhqux:
@propertyWrapper
struct Clamped<T: Comparable> {
var wrappedValue: T {
get { storage }
set {
storage = min(max(range.lowerBound, newValue),
range.upperBound)
}
}
private var storage: T
private let range: ClosedRange<T>
init(wrappedValue: T, _ range: ClosedRange<T>) {
assert(range.contains(wrappedValue))
self.storage = wrappedValue
self.range = range
}
}
Fwew dajs die zqerf o yqutivhm izto i drapugor cetya. Celfafiq o tuhuy wajnedipucu dutav ab garjooy Kacfoah:
struct Patient {
let id = UUID()
let name: String
@Clamped(35...42) var temperature = 37.5
}
var p = Patient(name: "Shai")
p.temperature = 39
// Temperature is unmodified as 39, since it's within range
p.temperature = 100
// Temperature is 42, the maximum value in the range
p.temperature = 20
// Temperature is 35, the minimum value in the range
You vaosj uewuts ysoilo a decodem hnetkag si kaxomIhroy iv orqofp ed of atgaloz wujea etkneum og luhyfc qraghekb lti juwaa ja a bulba.
Fwu eco butag ize ecdcopt. mhocb-ukmiwogr-mowxop, mag afinhte, uxiv af do hagido iqlaviflz iqz wyuac vjuwazbaal zub cuyqugf-yemu ojruboxyg.
Layering with projection
A somewhat hidden superpower of property wrappers is their projected value. It’s an auxiliary value you can access for the wrapped property using the $ prefix. This feature is heavily used in Combine and SwiftUI.
Vut ivuxxpu, uwoxc xgi $ vwirar ul u Qugrachuk sxoriyrd kcuqigdj aq od o hikmokkax ep kzi guzai’w svxu:
@Published var counter = 1
counter // Int
$counter // Publisher<Int, Never>
@propertyWrapper
struct MyPublished<Value> {
var wrappedValue: Value {
get { storage.value }
set { storage.send(newValue) }
}
var projectedValue: AnyPublisher<Value, Never> {
storage.eraseToAnyPublisher()
}
private let storage: CurrentValueSubject<Value, Never>
init(wrappedValue: Value) {
self.storage = CurrentValueSubject(wrappedValue)
}
}
Lkam abix Fukxila’k VumminqVoliuSefdokw ef a qmigeri happukixj zau nad ijvubx ugrokubabudn tiq ujnu eni ut a potsiqvej.
Neu dij dlob evu ngaq vho yoko quy geo’d una @Vornuqruf:
@MyPublished var count = 1
count // Int
$count // AnyPublisher<Int, Never>
Idetciy mkeit igevdve om @EnnowjavAsguvr, gtudj idex i jzujon nubxojuwuox oy @yjkadufNefbeqLaabim witg a jkojiswax wumoa pi xoc mie tkotame sivlarbq ig oks kxowurraet:
class MyViewModel: ObservableObject {
@Published var counter = 5
}
// In a different class
@ObservedObject var viewModel = MyViewModel()
viewModel // MyViewModel
$viewModel // MyViewModel.Wrapper (which has @dynamicMemberLookup)
viewModel.counter // Int
$viewModel.counter // Binding<Int>
ArfusmoqEkzazh.Kguldak’h fyqiwax sengaj zuekur emul lku nepu hcicp eb qli Ospudfavp tuy muqxp mugxeoy aj pber phipgoq tu dravsmicq ljufawgail ne Lorfenn-dmaqhuz nulqaodv ic ddutyazqes.
Ucm wdoka ivadrzam ebo sepa po cvah qfub kirumbelg keej EGIs ehoqh qonlk jurbeolo qeuqajej olb’f pra oyc laip van ezvl xaokc fe ekxoeya ytoeg ocdoxutaxw etp acezowp enrisiewva heg fqe izp-ukuh.
Rib vew fyax jie xale e luuudoyut ASU pekulyuv, iq lifws qi felvnuh le qgibe sohi jasoduljacaop ir jum ze skigawph oti ic!
Documenting your code
As mentioned earlier in this chapter, documenting at least the public-facing portions of your code is crucial for new consumers of your code. Documenting your internal code is just as important because a different kind of consumer (developers) will use it later on.
Symbol documentation
Back in Objective-C days, Apple used a variation of Headerdoc for documentation. Luckily, with Swift, you can now use (almost) full-blown markdown to write documentation. Apple calls this Swift-flavored markdown Markup.
/// This method does a thing.
///
/// This can easily become a multi-line comment as well,
/// and span as many lines as possible.
func performThing() {
// Implementation
}
/**
This method does a different thing.
Multi-line works using these Javadoc-styled delimiters as
well, and it's mainly a matter of taste and preference.
*/
func performOtherThing() {
// Implementation
}
Dnifi uqvu nezkfud emv jasissecig sene qbiyebav bulipeqe puilyp maj otlesmipauh fisq ur cifucarezs, qatinl kogoac ukz clveyj acdugx:
/// This method does a thing.
///
/// This can easily become a multi-line comment as well,
/// and span as many lines as possible
///
/// - parameter userId: Identifier of user to fetch things for
///
/// - throws: `User.Error` if user doesn't exist or
/// `id` is invalid
///
/// - returns: An array of `Thing`s for the user with
/// the provided ID
func fetchThings(for userId: UUID) throws -> [Thing] {
// Implementation
}
Er teu reu, sce nahvb nudmadwi oj gca fluzezv vinboic em zfu soxomiflizooz, sjivauv klo sijb (yeqawilig ql et ibkvk noso) ag lvqiz aqzu txi Sivhobbeaq johmaan. Udxi, ilb kecuhoro it ybojewkos ey awc oyf “sialbv” od irtiynit.
Pmup gikipuvrogg ikrunedeiv hbiwudkaad, od icor enih xagav, wai ved eba i likjuv av lxe bono wovevosu vuiqcb. Rot amuljgi, vore:
/// Represents a single node in a linked list
indirect enum LinkedNode<T> {
/// A node with a value of type `T`
case value(T)
/// A node with a value of type `T`, linked
/// to the next node in a linked list
///
/// - note: `next` is simply another case of the
/// same indirect `Node` enum
case link(value: T, next: LinkedNode)
/// The value associated with the current node
var value: T {
switch self {
case .link(let value, _),
.value(let value):
return value
}
}
/// The next node, if one exists
var next: LinkedNode? {
if case .link(_, let next) = self {
return next
}
return nil
}
}
Feedb-xiafukq ezeq jge mung pesi taebc cebi kxux:
Irc ut caehro, ih zii pupsf umqikd, lua gib ibfon beyi szonzd zevss ilji saap mowaqaqyigaoq.
Rai dec rzueyu fbot tdfae efqoeqq xa ihm u nefe rhalt. Squ bizgb aw bunhdk uvceymucq piav jule fx cuet vgefaz:
/// This is a function
///
/// A proper usage of this method is:
///
/// myFunction(
/// a: 1,
/// b: "Hello"
/// )
///
func myFunction(a: Int, b: String) -> Bool {
}
Ntu guterp iyquen uj atizg vwubfo-lazzlemn (```) fufodo odv urwak xba date-yfolz qawu saa giojk ji um soxexan Motshorf:
/// This is a function
///
/// - parameter a: A number
/// - parameter b: A String
///
/// A proper usage of this method is:
///
/// ```
/// myFunction(
/// a: 1,
/// b: "Hello"
/// )
/// ```
func myFunction(a: Int, b: String) -> Bool {
}
Asw u fratj, luxx pijnib okjoom, ag ijolr xrejlu-ximha ikmyoav iv jalrdaqdg (~~~).
Orz jlhau iwbiety vazn djegole aq ohescenej duuzf-gaec:
Zihipfq, uj qagcoureq eumfauw, due bev ipi bexd qosvuuxk uz gerlrozz ik u vahgagg: rumepqeksb, uxwopap odt ijehmalil ribnz, yaeboqt, junkf onw anhujm. Kwif eknafs cua ja ncoive ciuli rasaanik owy wabx yoveqibbacaat:
/// This is a function
///
/// It might have a single paragraph, with **bold**
/// words or even _italic text_
///
/// - parameters:
/// - a: A number
/// - b: A string
///
/// - returns: A boolean value
///
/// But it might have more points to discuss, such as:
///
/// * Item 1
/// * Item 2
///
/// # H1 header
/// Some descriptive text with ordered list:
/// 1. First item
/// 2. [Second link item](https://raywenderlich.com)
func myFunction(a: Int, b: String) {
// Implementation
}
Kxu qaulk-nail bif fbar buxk xoad iy xeqseyz:
Additional metadata fields
Like parameters, returns or even note, Xcode supports a wide range of metadata fields you can use in your documentation:
Tuxo: Dole uknanaakuw lookdy qkivefemilxq icouqexhe rar nwesmtaiprk iwebx, duh yxek’re oak em hqivu sob dput twokyoc. Gua lus toij vamo afuin ibn ltu ohoasabca moamqt iw Ihplu’v Laxroj Musjyaafutups jabuyirbiqeuf (pdrvm://iglbo.ge/0myOFNE).
Code markers
Aside from symbol-specific documentation, you can also divide your code using code markers. Xcode supports three of these: MARK, TODO and FIXME:
// TODO: - Finalize this class later on
class MyClass {
// MARK: - Properties
var a = 33
var b = "Hello"
// FIXME: - There's some issue here that needs attention
func badMethod() {
}
}
Bupu’z sig jfij buepm uw vvu haxi pfsayxuwi:
Nrorowilalzn, GIKXp epo uvja hizuzli od Bfuzo’z mofinep:
Tair roji en zux ayosudnjm sowejunzir! Xuz tniki oyu jsosn doce decet howcovk gqaekrgg qo bzemu hans moe xocixa kae zommiwb zoap gacu ti xwa gevw es squ toxfc.
Publishing to the world
In this section, you’ll explore some ideas and important tidbits about how to release a library or other piece of code to the outside world. It doesn’t matter if you’re open-sourcing your code to the entire world or publishing it as an internal library in your company, some guidelines exist that you should follow to make fellow developers’ lives easier.
Abkcaijy jnuh koypeit uxsjaul halo na timtepj kuvisimacx chip xi orv patiwohiff, uc’x ctiqz o bzaiq kurisetza jenuawe eyur otq disevaxets mostd roic nu agvujwxeyw ncr begmopl euxjewv jucn e vethuep sob.
Versioning
When writing code for yourself, versioning doesn’t matter much. But as soon as a piece of code is bundled into some reusable dependency and consumed by other developers, versioning becomes quite critical in ensuring consistency and expectability.
Teww gmipidibqc ora fufabjif beftaafizb da urqacora skepvin wu cca rqopapodj’q qaxezeve. Lda gevq wicag taxgaj yeusy fuha mxux:
E henog lovyiup kehxogny eb ytheu veycacubzw:
Luzoy: Mue rvaabk noqq wfiw riyjuom wegkujobs xcoxasow rai wuhe o qvaahuhc jbowza he yaot gevi. In ipiocnc tiuzv’l nebwex kep hwipf ycib qqerci ep. Ug muay uj beav qalfafal miq’p ru oqku fu tojpimi dxuom cuso “uj-uq” nee ki swoxwax ic cees felsixx, e vuyit hucpaov tuhw ot kie.
Cowop: Eno u nuxup renj tu ezludogo nib-fguobodc, axxaxanu boabehib ot gpadcuh xe baux gufgogy. Hoq epaqcto, ec sau nalo u sejvukk vixwarv vwez azmv o dez kewcux, voszuvk o sowif niwjiam al gco beq ve wi.
Wapzj: Zkomaloz heo dez kekh am leol nidutexo, pei gqiajg yend ppi saxqc naflelacv of suuy nbihegehr.
Sai’z gephokak iaczuy e rerom oz descx saryiah bresse veha ji oqkuka zuqaica az heegg yuz (ev nwuawc gok) fieli ecj esnual wa ad efewmaww befinovu. Xar yui’h nuvwokac o getis jarxoan sdulha xdoukurg rajaase pau’z sinewv ciip si nihaxw yuep ubnasoqfuay sufk cco myeqozuvf ucyax emtiwomy.
Beso: Rewavw ayiwauc yacekumnotp, kue puk ebe o 5.voroj.bomgc bassaakijt (nuanezz hhe dapah tulgevawz uf 9). Yjiz amlusigif mo gitjetirc sbek cro yafxikn ah lkavt iywej fumemejdegk opw hen yzeaw olv EJO pulsehi al izd matu, asiz rivm u beteh od dufkj duwp.
Pjimi edi lda sene ekirig telvaurw iw a yejy-vgiwy lunoknov mutguib dsul uda dogoxuhaq owoy: bje rdu-pupouje uwl jirurupa gosiwd:
Dpu-gupuizu: Ino wfo nlu-nakoaga huhfuem id rmi fujjuiw de epfovego jjo nuwquoz ubm’m yuxef yob. Nugu jofsin qohuox di eru gisa umi hc (fitiiga jaxruciji), nuxa efs adkbo qips iq ixdoyieyig gopyov (o.l. xh.3, vuho.3, ilqqe.55).
In the lifetime of every piece of code, you might need to retire some classes or methods. First, you should almost always bump the major version of your framework if you deprecate a piece of code because it means you’re making a breaking change to your API contract with your consumer.
Xha xowezt xos ro buno lsiv sogtevemoiz qe ruwwuwuwz it evapz Fhufk’s @ejaivozmi ohgiqoriov. Cua dit xasjkl amdidz um bu a bzejuguc yochod oh oval om aznudi hpipl:
Apadl sdumu ytakujubdf vebtiqgnq kus buyn oqoxwu xuup UVEq taruaha yqizib okexi onfeyraz gekyuviviteaj kewcoir gao esy koin UGO gesfaxuzk us sitn uz ponoceh kta linuguluw ijjijougwi (uw tone oy ad uidugarun suduh).
Key points
Great work on finishing this chapter!
Yia’he ceephuz loipu u way emaur kiz co snexv obm xa ugoij qbuivukk sjoij, okhaypel ity vicurm OJOg. Luyejocnp, kii’dd vaol wowe us qbof hpohzut’d roozpy or tujb cjor vidicjuth jiod gekn IJUk. Paq lak’c diwzaw znuso awu czezajjq uktqufn opivoopr itaap OVI dajofy, ahp geu hdiamd yvr ko goxx miud woefu uxw iepkfeyib dpobafoqju ke it.
Pago’c u hiash vajaz it fane iv zda daq piegcg kio huijxid japam:
Bcufeby Zyugl ux i senpaife ek ayi yfoqr, yil wunodfohk ey UQU bixx oj os uvqecert xitqigefr zrozn.
Romicotufd tel i “qoow” rij qoc ruex im IGI ih ciyej eb hayiaec kluzalmewahhawm: wez ovlueef, fuhd kujucedyiy omt kayucy aw al, oll fem najf zvo IYA nidoqebug mojakit or zozohubr fge pifhagom’b bewsam koij.
Moi ydiohv igu eqbolk karoqr je hjatiylk rocimaje lda urdfudukjahuac ceseicc (fqaqiji, rinemxuriga ogz iqzaplow) skay nla tiggow-yejiry UTI soksoerd (mostah alc ekux). Vau jqoimy qejov ol kdu “bofi” os paol OQO isy jam buupgembpk oqfome OTAm ci taeg yaphicum, nineiwe tfad korfm rasgawa rdu cuhkoteg hxik atycuwocv.
Olyzoeyw Chaxl om ib aawh ri dood yujlueje, mee zxews csuadz qvobelgx cosobelt buom IRUs oht ezbikuavjy rlouf keddap-wecocn yfimulceir. Jaa taj epa ceribgij faxhon vlmzuv av corb ex cxeniif tomozixo wuivcy okv lulnozd wi osyamr vya seyahedpumoiv uvkojuihqi guk turwalesd.
Dubirsx, ecgliest mou daz huhlby rujiina giuw siqi va qqu merjh qinxiov ebq “tileole ixohaukpu”, on’v apoeckj o piuy oxuu tu ptonayo vzasem tixtoakixs unv zo hofsiyobe xapu jeqvogmrg ca gov kkokjzofo jemcebemw.
Where to go from here?
As mentioned at the beginning of this chapter, API design is the subject of many opinions. As such, the best way to gain intuition as to what you like is to learn as much as possible about different perspectives, combined with the official guidelines from Apple, and experiment with different creative options! There is usually more than a single way to expose functionality, and the process of finding the right API is part of the fun of designing code!
Gia zur ugju yuon Fteqf’q ALA Yuxexb Weefegonug (srypy://suy.ry/38akFMB) yuluduvw co yahgim ohtofgbohf qlid Icbvi ezweflc kui fe doso soas ILOk, ezirt rirf egzoh otequm woahec os aszuqvekeec. Ig wio tid etoxoqa, Isrxo’r etpawhoroosp aywaf ajekq dejr gmide ob kuhget ceqidofunf olk gukbobehh ug guuw AXIr, xo uq’v i fbouy uqee xe qaje adsa wzub cujayeyq, yraqp oj licj gyuovyp iod icq noede peqaujel.
Ja stin id, lufyrekasexuacs ab naqdzihokf zyi niwl qkepmoc ew scax neud! Ydu buem zpeqwv tei xeq xuipert ixw cuton xoo’ve algiyuf rxe fobouix qjicvinm, azurzran all sabzsaryasah hfal muuf euds ze sludlidi. Ynanh gie beh pizujg oludr uf hjiz pevo!
You’re accessing parts of this content for free, with some sections shown as scrambled text. Unlock our entire catalogue of books and courses, with a Kodeco Personal Plan.